checkthis / Fact checks / Politics
The Reel says
Debate clip misleadingly framing attacks on Abdul El-Sayed as proof of terror ties?
This Reel uses real Michigan Senate debate footage to push the misleading claim that Abdul El-Sayed failed to condemn terrorist groups and holds ties to extremists. While the video accurately captures heated exchanges from the debate, its framing ignores public records showing El-Sayed explicitly condemned terrorist attacks and Hamas war crimes. Reporting by CBS News and the Detroit Free Press confirms that claims linking El-Sayed to terrorist organizations or the Muslim Brotherhood are unfounded and misleading.
- 6 claims checked
- 7 sources
- Checked 8 Nov 2026
- Main source: Michigan Senate Debate Abdul El-Sayed Mike Rogers | Rev
The Reel we checked
@townhallmedia
"If you can't condemn the IRGC, you have no business in the United States Senate." Mike Rogers vs. Abdul El-Sayed in the Michigan Senate debate. Asked whether…
Watch on Instagram ↗What we checked
What we couldn't check
- We couldn't find the full original video, so we can't say what was said just before or after this clip.
Our read of the video
Authentic broadcast footage from the Michigan U.S. Senate candidate debate featuring Mike Rogers and Abdul El-Sayed.
What the Reel doesn't tell you
- The Reel presents Mike Rogers' debate accusations as established facts without noting that El-Sayed had previously condemned terrorist violence and Hamas war crimes, or that media fact-checkers found the allegations of terrorist ties misleading.
- Abdul El-Sayed stated during the debate that he explicitly condemned the terrorist violence and disavowed the Muslim Brotherhood, while his campaign explained that previous references to dual Egyptian citizenship were erroneous administrative mistakes.
- CBS News and Israel National News report that Abdul El-Sayed explicitly condemned the March terrorist attack in Michigan and acknowledged Hamas's responsibility for war crimes. Bridge Michigan and the Detroit Free Press reported that claims linking El-Sayed to the Muslim Brotherhood or designated terrorist organizations are misleading and lack supporting evidence.
How it plays you
It wants you to think: “Abdul El-Sayed failed to condemn terrorist groups like IRGC, Hamas, and Hezbollah during the debate and holds questionable ties, whereas Mike Rogers strongly called him out.”
The conclusion that El-Sayed is unfit for office due to failing to condemn terrorism rests on false premises, as news reporting confirms he explicitly condemned terrorist acts and Hamas war crimes.
Short version
Does this look wrong?
Related checks
Education spending and school closure claims rely on conflated metrics@nishantmittal2410 · Politics · 11 Nov 2026
Did the Gandhi family execute a ₹5,000-crore real estate heist via Young Indian?Politics · 11 Nov 2026
Fact-checking claims on Muslim personal law, non-Muslim laws, and Article 44@asal_sangathi · Politics · 10 Nov 2026
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel