checkthis / Fact checks / Society & religion
The Reel says
Reel falsely claims systemic anti-Christian policy bias in US states?
The Reel's claim of a public policy double standard against Christians relies on a false report of a Massachusetts law and misrepresents local policy in New York and Connecticut. Massachusetts did not create an American Muslim commission; the bill expired without passing into law (State Senator Jamie Eldridge's official statement). Connecticut's curriculum law makes optional resources available for Islamic and Arab studies, mirroring existing programs for other historical and ethnic studies rather than promoting religion in schools (Jerusalem Post). In Brighton, New York, the town did not ban Christmas displays, but is defending itself in an ongoing federal lawsuit over ignored display requests (Rochester Beacon).
- 3 claims checked
- 4 sources
- Checked 9 Nov 2026
- Main source: Connecticut law adds optional Islamic, Arab studies programs | The Jerusalem Post
▶The Reel we checked
@robsmithonline
Double standards EXPOSED as public property bans Christmas displays while welcoming Ramadan banners!
Watch on Instagram ↗Red flags
A resident of Brighton filed a federal lawsuit alleging town officials repeatedly ignored requests to place a nativity scene in a public square.
“Polverino’s suit claims that Brighton’s “sustained pattern of non-response, spanning multiple Christmas seasons, constitutes a de facto denial” In Brighton, a Nativity scene becomes a constitutional fight - Rochester BeaconRochester Beacon, 2026-08-31
The trick: Picks only some facts
It shows the facts that fit and leaves out those that don't (known as cherry-picking).
“it always seems like there just seems to be special exceptions for pretty much every other religion but Christians”
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
What the Reel doesn't tell you
- The Reel omits that the Massachusetts bill creating an American Muslim commission never became law, that Connecticut's curriculum guidance is optional for local school districts and mirrors existing state laws for other cultural and historical programs, and that the town of Brighton denies discriminating against Christian displays in an ongoing federal lawsuit.
- The Town of Brighton filed a response in federal court denying that it violated constitutional rights or discriminated against Christian residents seeking holiday displays (Rochester Beacon).
- State Senator Jamie Eldridge stated that the Massachusetts bill was intended to research community needs and strengthen civic engagement, but clarified it failed to pass before the session ended (State Senator Jamie Eldridge's official statement).
How it plays you
It wants you to think: “Public institutions and Democrats exhibit a double standard that discriminates against Christians while accommodating Islam.”
The argument fails because it relies on a false claim that Massachusetts created a state Muslim commission, mischaracterizes optional Connecticut curriculum guidelines as a ban on Christianity in public schools, and presents an unresolved lawsuit over unresponded requests in New York as an established municipal ban.
Short version
Does this look wrong?
Related checks
Reel accurately describes a viral shoe-cleaning hack while doubting its claims@sherpa.offroad · Society & religion · 11 Nov 2026
Feminist leaders and activists are silent on women's rights when issues arise at Aligarh…Society & religion · Trick: Silence = guilt · 11 Nov 2026
Reel misrepresents the Hijra as a political migration strategy@mrpoliticalpeach · Society & religion · Trick: Twists the timeline · 10 Nov 2026
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel