checkthis / Fact checks / Politics
Govt threw out SC order to control Election Commission panel?
Checked 17 Oct 2026
The Reel correctly notes that a 2023 law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister on the Election Commission selection panel, giving the ruling party a 2-to-1 majority. However, it leaves out that the Supreme Court's March 2023 ruling was explicitly an interim measure meant to last only until Parliament enacted a law on the subject.
Main source: The Hindu
The Reel we checked
@india.theydontshow
कुर्सी भी तुम्हारी, कानून भी तुम्हारा है, फैसले पर लगा वो अंगूठा भी तुम्हारा है... हम तो बस नाम का मुंसिफ़ चुन रहे हैं, वरना पर्दे के पीछे का खेल पूरा तुम्हारा…
Watch the Reel on Instagram ↗The trick: Picks only some facts
It shows the facts that fit and leaves out those that don't (known as cherry-picking).
"March 2023 में Supreme Court ने अनूप बरनावाल case में साफ-साफ आदेश दिया था कि Chief Election Commissioner को तीन लोग चुनेंगे Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition और Chief Justice of India। लेकिन January 2024 में मोदी…"
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
🧩 Connected
- The same claim was checked in another Reel (@suresh_c_shaakya, 2026-10-13): "The Chief Justice of India was removed from the Election Commission Selection Committee and replaced by a…", found true (see it)
What the Reel doesn't tell you
- The Supreme Court specifically ordered that its arrangement was temporary until Parliament enacted a law.
What each side says
How it plays you
It wants you to think: "The government illegally bypassed the Supreme Court to steal control of election appointments."
The Supreme Court's ruling explicitly specified that its three-member committee was a temporary measure only until Parliament passed its own law on the matter under Article 324(2).
- Selective framing: "मोदी सरकार ने चुपचाप एक gazette notification लाकर Supreme Court के आदेश को एक रद्दी के डब्बे में फेंक दिया". The Reel frames a statutory law passed by Parliament as a sneaky administrative notification that defied the judiciary, hiding the fact that the Court itself had invited Parliament to legislate.
- Loaded language: "रद्दी के डब्बे में फेंक दिया". It uses contemptuous framing to make a standard parliamentary legislative act look like an illegal act of defiance.
Short version
Does this look wrong?
Related checks
India is uniquely stable while European nations suffer widespread instabilityPolitics · Trick: Picks only some facts · 19 Oct 2026
Mahua Moitra was singled out regarding Circuit House accommodation@advcsankit · Politics · 18 Oct 2026
BBC headlines prove biased reporting on student protests worldwidePolitics · Trick: Mixes up two things · 18 Oct 2026
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel