Send a Reel

checkthis / Fact checks / Politics

Govt threw out SC order to control Election Commission panel?

checkthis · automated fact-check · How we check

Half the storyTrick: Picks only some facts

Checked 17 Oct 2026

The Reel correctly notes that a 2023 law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister on the Election Commission selection panel, giving the ruling party a 2-to-1 majority. However, it leaves out that the Supreme Court's March 2023 ruling was explicitly an interim measure meant to last only until Parliament enacted a law on the subject.

Main source: The Hindu

It leaves out something that changes it. Reel by @india.theydontshow

The Reel we checked▶

The Reel we checked

@india.theydontshow

कुर्सी भी तुम्हारी, कानून भी तुम्हारा है, फैसले पर लगा वो अंगूठा भी तुम्हारा है... हम तो बस नाम का मुंसिफ़ चुन रहे हैं, वरना पर्दे के पीछे का खेल पूरा तुम्हारा…

Watch the Reel on Instagram ↗

The trick: Picks only some facts

It shows the facts that fit and leaves out those that don't (known as cherry-picking).

"March 2023 में Supreme Court ने अनूप बरनावाल case में साफ-साफ आदेश दिया था कि Chief Election Commissioner को तीन लोग चुनेंगे Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition और Chief Justice of India। लेकिन January 2024 में मोदी…"

The Reel frames Parliament passing a law as defying the Supreme Court, but the Court's 2023 judgment explicitly stated its panel was a temporary measure until Parliament enacted a law.

How this trick works and how to answer it →

What we checked

✕
In January 2024, the Modi government passed a notification removing the Chief Justice of India from the Selection Committee for appointing Election Commissioners.The Hindu
✓
In March 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in the Anoop Baranwal case that the Chief Election Commissioner will be selected by a three-member committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India.The Hindu

🧩 Connected

What the Reel doesn't tell you

What each side says

Modi governmentThe government defended the appointment law, asserting that courts should not presume the Prime Minister would act against democratic values. India Today

How it plays you

It wants you to think: "The government illegally bypassed the Supreme Court to steal control of election appointments."

The Supreme Court's ruling explicitly specified that its three-member committee was a temporary measure only until Parliament passed its own law on the matter under Article 324(2).

Short version

🧩 HALF THE STORY 👉 The Reel correctly notes that a 2023 law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister on the Election Commission selection panel, giving the ruling party a 2-to-1 majority. 👉 However, it leaves out that the Supreme Court's March 2023 ruling was explicitly an interim measure meant to last only until Parliament enacted a law on the subject. 🎭 Trick: Picks only some facts 📰 Source: The Hindu 🔎 Full check: send this Reel to @checkthis.chat

Does this look wrong?

Related checks

MisleadingIndia is uniquely stable while European nations suffer widespread instabilityPolitics · Trick: Picks only some facts · 19 Oct 2026
No proof yetMahua Moitra was singled out regarding Circuit House accommodation@advcsankit · Politics · 18 Oct 2026
Half the storyBBC headlines prove biased reporting on student protests worldwidePolitics · Trick: Mixes up two things · 18 Oct 2026

Check a Reel yourself

Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.

Send a Reel