checkthis / Fact check
MisleadingTrick: Fake comparisonThe claim that ISRO as a whole is being sold to private companies is misleading. A 410th Parliamentary Standing Committee report did express concern over the transfer of space technologies at disproportionately low prices relative to their commercial potential. For instance, technology for distress alert transmitters used by fishermen was transferred to private firms for a fee as low as ₹6,000. However, these transfers involve non-exclusive licenses for specific technologies, not the sale of ISRO itself.
The Reel we checked
@sivankannan_irs
PARLIAMENTARY EXPOSÉ ON THE ISRO SALEBUY ISRO TECH FOR AS LOW AS ₹.6000
Watch the Reel on Instagram ↗🚩 What's concerning
The Department of Space transferred space technologies to private players at disproportionately low prices without having a credible mechanism to verify whether benefits were passed on to intended target users.
"TheCommittee expresses concern over the transfer of technologies in the space sector at disproportionately low prices relative to their commercial potential. Furthermore, there is no credible mechanism to verify whether the benefits of…" WION, 2026-03-27
Department of Space response: "Since this technology is intended for societal benefit, it was transferred to industry at a low or zero price for those who had already taken the first-generation DAT technology." The Wire
The trick: Fake comparison
It treats two very different things as the same (known as false equivalence).
"A very innocuous small sentence, but behind that, a whole organization is being sold."
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
What the Reel doesn't tell you
- The Department of Space stated that low prices for technology like the Distress Alert Transmitter were intended for societal benefit to aid small-boat fishermen.
What each side says
How it plays you
It wants you to think: "Public obsession with religious sites keeps citizens from noticing the secret sell-off of national assets like ISRO."
Public interest in religious monuments does not prevent parliamentary scrutiny or reporting on ISRO's technology transfers. Furthermore, transferring non-exclusive technology licenses does not mean selling the space agency.
- Exaggeration: "a whole organization is being sold". It inflates policy concerns over undervalued licensing fees into a complete liquidation of a state institution.
- Red herring: "We are all bothered more about, uh, Ram Temple and, uh, Hanuman Temple". It shifts focus away from the specifics of space technology pricing to attack public interest in religious monuments.
Short version
Does this look wrong?
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel