Partly trueTrick: Accuses by asking

On September 18, 2026, a Delhi court granted default bail to US citizen Matthew VanDyke because the NIA filed an incomplete chargesheet.

Some of it's right, some isn't. Reel by @itsshrutimusic · checked 7 Oct 2026

🚩 What's concerning

The NIA filed an incomplete chargesheet on the statutory deadline without the original UAPA charges, leading the court to grant default bail.

"the charge sheet filed by the NIA on September 8, which was also the deadline day, only invoked “piecemeal,” charges of Sections 21 and 23" The Hindu

The trick: Accuses by asking

It asks a loaded question to plant a claim it never has to prove (known as accusing by question).

"ऐसा कैसे हो सकता है कि Modi जी ये tragedy ना दोहराएं और अपने great friend को gift ना दें।"

Asking a loaded rhetorical question does not provide evidence of a hidden corrupt deal or motive.

How this trick works and how to answer it →

What we checked

✓

The Indian government released American Matthew Winney and his six foreign associates who trained militants against India in drone bombing and weapons handling.India Today + 2 more

✓

During Atal Bihari Vajpayee's government, three major terrorists—Masood Azhar, Omar Said, and Mushtaq Ahmed—were released and escorted by Ajit Doval himself.New Indian Express + 1 more

What the Reel doesn't tell you

The court granted bail because the NIA failed to file UAPA charges within the 180-day statutory deadline.

What each side says

BJP government and PM ModiThe External Affairs Ministry stated that the case is a legal matter proceeding per court directions. The Wire

Atal Bihari Vajpayee governmentThe NDA maintained that the decision to release the terrorists was made collectively by the cabinet to secure hostage release. Times of India

How it tries to persuade you

It wants you to think: "Prime Minister Modi deliberately freed a foreign terror suspect due to political subservience."

Court records show VanDyke received statutory default bail because the NIA filed a piecemeal chargesheet without UAPA charges, not because of a political order or gift.

Insult and loaded language: "Kutta bhi wafadar hota hai pr BJP NHI". Compares the ruling party unfavorably to an animal to provoke instant contempt before presenting any facts.
Exaggeration and dismissal: "BJP / CONGRESS koi nhi chahiye pehle DESH". Dismisses all mainstream political options to amplify anti-establishment outrage and frame normal legal proceedings as national betrayal.

Does this look wrong?

Check a Reel yourself

Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.

Send a Reel