checkthis / Fact check
ExaggeratedTrick: Accuses by askingThe Election Commission says the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) removes illegal immigrants and dead voters. No evidence connects peaceful protests against it to lost foreign investment or youth unemployment.
The Reel says
Electoral roll revisions remove illegal immigrants to ensure 'national development'
- ✅ Removing illegal immigrants TrueSIR was implemented to remove dead and illegal voters
- 📢 “National development” ExaggeratedRevisions are routine but have become controversial
The Reel we checked
@akash.decodes
They came as Azadi slogan, upholder and went back as we are already in Azadi. We already have freedom and democracy properly, and they agreed that the protest…
Watch the Reel on Instagram ↗🚩 What's concerning
The voter list revision in Bihar was rushed in one month, resulting in intense pressure, lack of training, and serious irregularities such as forged signatures and uploading forms of dead voters.
"This process, which was completed in just one month, exposed the intense pressure on officials to finish the task and lack of training at all levels. As a result, allegations of serious irregularities like forged signatures, uploading…" Alt News, 2025-08-19
How many foreign illegal immigrants were actually found during the Special Intensive Revision, given that the ECI cited their inclusion as a primary reason for the exercise but provided no figures?
"Yet, one year after the SIR started, the ECI is yet to provide a figure for the number of alleged "foreign illegal immigrants" that have been found on electoral rolls" The Wire, 2026-06-30
"Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar did not provide any details about the number of foreign “illegal immigrants” found in the rolls." The Wire, 2026-06-30
The trick: Accuses by asking
It asks a loaded question to plant a claim it never has to prove (known as accusing by question).
"So these people are nationals or anti-nationals?"
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
What the other side said
How it tries to persuade you
It wants you to think: "Citizens protesting the voter list revision are anti-national and easily manipulated."
Peaceful protest and demanding electoral transparency are constitutional rights. Disagreeing with an administrative exercise does not make citizens anti-national, nor does one protester's confusion represent millions of concerned voters.
- Causal oversimplification: "because if protests like this keep happening, internationally, we won't get any investment because our country will be…". It links complex macroeconomic outcomes like foreign direct investment and youth employment entirely to domestic political protests, without any supporting data.
Does this look wrong?
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel