checkthis / Fact check
Mostly trueTrick: ExaggeratesThe post's main points check out, though some details are overstated. It misrepresents low utilization rates from a local 224-household study in Gautam Buddha Nagar as national statistics. Additionally, audit records show 7.5 lakh beneficiaries were linked in the database to the invalid number 9999999999—not paid directly—and 4,761 registrations were tied to seven Aadhaar numbers rather than a single card. However, the audit confirms that nearly Rs 7 crore was paid for thousands of claims involving deceased patients, and over Rs 57 crore in excess payments went to hospitals in four states.
The Reel says
CAG report exposes Ayushman Bharat irregularities and "widespread corruption
- ✅ Payments for dead beneficiaries TrueOver 7 crore paid for 4,000 dead beneficiaries
- 📢 “Widespread corruption” ExaggeratedAudit irregularities do not automatically prove widespread corruption
▶The trick: Exaggerates
It inflates the facts beyond what the evidence shows (known as exaggeration).
"पहला एक ही मोबाइल नंबर nine nine nine nine nine nine nine nine nine से साढ़े सात लाख लोगों के account का payment कर दिया गया।"
The Reel inflates the CAG's findings by claiming a mobile number was used for payments rather than registration, stating one Aadhaar was used instead of seven, and presenting a tiny local survey as national data.
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
✕
Under the Ayushman Bharat scheme, payments were made to 7.5 lakh beneficiaries registered with the same mobile number 9999999999.Times of India
✕
Under the Ayushman Bharat scheme, nearly 4,800 people were registered using a single Aadhaar card number.The Hindu
✕
Only 8 percent of beneficiaries in urban India and 15 percent in rural India have utilized the benefits of the Ayushman Bharat scheme.NIH
✓
Under the Ayushman Bharat scheme, over 7 crore rupees was paid for 4,000 claims where the beneficiaries were already dead.Scroll
✓
In four states, excess payments amounting to over 57 crore rupees were made under the Ayushman Bharat scheme.The Wire
?
In Jharkhand, nearly 1,800 patients received Ayushman Bharat treatment at hospitals not empanelled in the scheme's list.No reliable source found for this yet.
What the Reel doesn't tell you
- The Health Ministry clarified that mobile numbers were used for communication and feedback rather than for identity verification or beneficiary eligibility.
What each side says
critics of the Ayushman Bharat schemeCritics point to the CAG report findings of data discrepancies and financial irregularities to accuse the government of corruption and cheating the poor. Hindustan Times
National Health Authority and governmentThe government defended the scheme, stating that mobile numbers were not utilized for beneficiary verification and addressing audit findings. The Hindu
How it tries to persuade you
- Exaggeration of audit findings: "nine nine nine nine nine nine nine nine nine से साढ़े सात लाख लोगों के account का payment कर दिया गया।". The Reel claims money was paid out to accounts linked to a single phone number, whereas the CAG report found that the number was linked to card registrations in the database, not direct payouts. It also claims 4,800 people registered under one Aadhaar card, when the report noted 4,761 registrations spread across seven Aadhaar numbers.
- Extrapolating local data to a national trend: "urban India में सिर्फ आठ percent लोगों ने scheme का benefit लिया है और ग्रामीण area में सिर्फ पंद्रह percent लोगों ने…". The Reel presents low utilization rates as national figures for all of India. The cited study was actually a small survey of 224 households in a single district, Gautam Buddha Nagar in Uttar Pradesh.
- Loaded language: "8 scams of Ayushman Bharat". It frames administrative audit discrepancies and data entry errors as deliberate financial scams before detailing the claims.
Does this look wrong?
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel