checkthis / Fact check
MisleadingTrick: Twists their wordsIt is true that 11 female students accused Congress MP Bimol Akoijam of sexual harassment, and JNU dismissed him after an internal committee recommended major punishment. However, the Reel is misleading when it claims Congress sent leader Renuka Chowdhury to "defend him" on television; she actually stated on air that "If he's guilty, hang him. No one's going to protect him." Akoijam denies the allegations, and a police investigation is ongoing.
The post we checked
Women must wake up. These fancy slogans and fake outrage baiters and smooth talkers will never push the real cause ahead. They had over 79 years to do that.…
⚖️ Where the case stands
🗣️ Alleged
- "According to reports, at least 11 female students had filed sexual harassment complaints against the professor in May this year. The complaints alleged that he invited students to his campus residence on the pretext of meetings or gatherings and attempted to sexually harass them." New Indian Express, 2026-10-12
- Their response: "Akoijam denies the allegations, calling his dismissal a 'witch hunt' and questioning whether due process and POSH law provisions were followed." Rediff, 2026-10-09
❓ Still open
- Investigation open: "Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam appeared before the Delhi Police on Thursday in connection with a sexual harassment case" India Today, 2026-10-15
The trick: Twists their words
It attacks a distorted version of what the other side said (known as strawman).
"They sent a woman leader - Renuka Chaudhary to defend him last night on India Today."
How this trick works and how to answer it →
What we checked
🧩 Connected
- The same claim was checked in another Reel (@peektv_in, 2026-10-16): "At least 11 female JNU students filed sexual harassment complaints against Angomcha Bimol Akoijam in May.", found true (see it)
What each side says
How it plays you
It wants you to think: "Congress leaders and feminist advocates actively protect sexual harassers within their party"
Renuka Chowdhury explicitly stated on air that no one would protect Akoijam if he is found guilty, directly contradicting the post's claim that she was sent to defend him.
- Argument from silence: "Not a single statement by Rahul or Priyanka.". It treats the absence of a public statement from specific party leaders as proof that the entire party is conspiring to cover up sexual misconduct.
Short version
Does this look wrong?
Check a Reel yourself
Send any Reel to @checkthis.chat on Instagram. You get a reply like this in a minute or two.
Send a Reel